Article 75b: Commitments
Summary
Article 75b allows the AI Office to make commitments offered by an operator during enforcement proceedings legally binding where they ensure compliance with the AI Act, and to declare that there are no further grounds for action. The AI Office may reopen the proceedings if the underlying facts materially change, the operator breaches its commitments, or the decision was based on incomplete, incorrect or misleading information. Where the proposed commitments are insufficient to ensure effective compliance, the AI Office must reject them by reasoned decision.
The summaries are meant to provide helpful explanation but are not legal binding.
NEW
If, during proceedings under Article 75a(2), the operator concerned offers commitments to ensure compliance with the relevant provisions of this Regulation, the AI Office may, by decision, make those commitments binding on the operator concerned and declare that there are no further grounds for action. The AI Office may, upon request or on its own initiative, reopen the proceedings where:
NEW
(a) there has been a material change in any of the facts on which the decision was based;
NEW
(b) the operator acts contrary to its commitments; or
NEW
(c) the decision was based on incomplete, incorrect or misleading information provided by the operator concerned.
NEW
Where the AI Office considers that the commitments offered by the operator concerned are unable to ensure effective compliance with the relevant provisions of this Regulation, it shall reject those commitments in a reasoned decision when concluding the proceedings.